'I'm all shook up'




Further to an earlier post regarding targetting Iran with 'earthquake inducing weaponry' and many 'predictions' of imminant quakes it looks like it may be true.

At least 66 people have been killed and more than 980 injured after two earthquakes hit western Iran.

Rescuers search through rubble for survivors
A quake measuring 5.1 on the Richter scale struck Boroujerd and Doroud, two industrial cities in a mountainous region of western Iran, at 1:05am local time.
It was followed by at least 10 aftershocks before a bigger earthquake with a magnitude of 6.0 hit Doroud at 4:47am local time.
State-run television said 38 bodies had been pulled out of destroyed houses in Silakhor, a region north of Doroud.
The broadcast said most of the injured people had been in bed when the quakes struck.
Mohammad Reza Mohseni-Sani, Lorestan governor-general, said hospitals in Boroujerd and Doroud were full to capacity and could not receive further injured. The death toll is expected to rise.
Ali Barani, a provincial official, said several villages had been flattened by the quake and added that rescue teams had been sent to the region.
Nasrollah Rashno, governor of Doroud, said the quake had damaged buildings in rural areas and cut telephone lines.
The earthquake was classified as moderate, but such quakes have killed thousands of people in the past in the Iranian countryside where houses are often built of bricks.



In February 2005, 612 people were killed and more than 1,400 injured when a 6.4-magnitude quake hit the town of Zarand in southern Iran. In December 2003, a magnitude 6.6 quake killed 32,000 people when it hit the historic city of Bam.
23 February 2005: 400 killed as quake reduces Iranian villages to rubble
27 December 2003: 20,000 killed by Iranian quake

How this all fits with the british military intelligence meeting to discuss the 'inevitable' American assault on Iranian nuclear installations and the acknowledgement that although eight known sites exist and are being targetted for 'enhanced' or should I say 'nuclear' bunker buster bombs' many more secret sites exist, many ungerground'. Could it be that in the western mountainous region of Iran near two industrialised cities there are/where secretive nuclear facilities that an earthquake might destroy hmmmmmmm.
Also quakes rarely have stronger aftershocks than the initial quake, hmmmmmmm.

Popular Posts